Comments on: Titling http://jenniespalette.com/2006/12/13/titling/ Exploring the artistic nude in the news and in the studio. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:07:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: chasingtigers http://jenniespalette.com/2006/12/13/titling/#comment-1566 Fri, 15 Dec 2006 13:04:09 +0000 http://palette.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/titling/#comment-1566 Titling is a very interesting question.

I’m very much in the ‘less-is-more’ camp, and let the viewer bring out the rest from the piece of art themselves.

However, these days, with people like Hirst calling things ‘The impossibility if of the idea of death in the mind of the living” (I’m sure I’ve got that wrong but you know what I mean) the title really becomes more the art itself!!

When you’ve got that lot on the caption plate why bother with wasting time producing the art at all!! ;-)

]]> By: dreamweaver http://jenniespalette.com/2006/12/13/titling/#comment-1518 Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:22:03 +0000 http://palette.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/titling/#comment-1518 yes, its good to have one word. Viewers are sure to have their own assumption.

]]> By: shelbycockrell http://jenniespalette.com/2006/12/13/titling/#comment-1494 Wed, 13 Dec 2006 23:35:23 +0000 http://palette.wordpress.com/2006/12/13/titling/#comment-1494 I like the one word title. When they get too long, you can lose interest.

]]>