“I am Bi, Female and Proud. I want no god who is disappointed in this”

GoMA-AS-crop.jpg
Ruth Naomi © Anthony Schrag

The open Bible is a central part of Made in God’s Image, an exhibition at the Gallery of Modern Art (Goma) in Glasgow. By the book is a container of pens and a notice saying: “If you feel you have been excluded from the Bible, please write your way back into it.” …

…Third, the comment I quote in the title for this piece falls into that category of topics that really begin to open up possibilities for any religious thinker not hellbent on regurgitating the same old line and truly interested in seeing Christianity reach a new generation:
One writer has altered the first line of the Old Testament from “In the beginning God created Heaven and Earth” to “In the beginning, God (me) I created religion.” Another has written “The Gospel According to Luke Skywalker”.
Whether the Church likes it or not, these sentiments (that man created religion and that morality lessons come to us via Pop culture more these days than via the Bible, and perhaps that’s OK) are the context in which the Church must today demonstrate its relevance. Those genies are out of the bottle, and only through the most draconian of measures could the Church get them back in again without addressing and discussing them openly.

Fourth, the sponsors of the exhibition are indicating they plan a highly disturbing response to the criticism:
Last night the producers of the exhibition indicated that the most offensive pages would be removed….
Really? Who decides what’s offensive? Some would say the entire concept is offensive, others would say censorship is even more offensive. This is a very bad idea in my opinion. If you can’t take the heat, close the show. Don’t edit it on the fly. You’re never going to find that happy middle ground in this.

[From Edward_ Winkleman]

This post by Edward Winkleman is a delight to read like many of his posts. between discussing the literary content of the Times article and listing it’s deficiencies one by one he has outlined more about the exhibition and it’s intent than the original article.

I find the concept rather interesting frankly, I would like to read the changes, funny and not, that people have written and see what others have to say. I hope that if it is censored the creators will consider making it an online project that people worldwide can contribute to. I hope that some priests and reverends take the time to read the comments to add relevance to their sermons and to draw in people.

The indication to me of this project, is not one of “lawlessness” (what laws have been broken?) but one of people crying out for help. obviously some of the messages are inflammatory or not intended to be serious- and that, too, is part of free speech and should not be ingored. I think that those in the pulpits would to well to heed the cries and try to tend their flocks.

I am not religious, but I find religion deeply fascinating. frankly in these times I think more and more people probably need the comfort and solace that religion often brings to those who believe. but without relevance they will be losing people, I remember listening to sermons bored because I couldn’t see how any of it applied to me. without answers I went looking for something else, I actually studied religions and different texts and ended up taking a bit of a hodgepodge of different faiths and forming my own basis of belief around my life experiences and bits and pieces of everything. it works for me. it’s relevant.

anyway,

I think if the gallery had been concerned as to the backlash they could have shown a similar project on the same topic, asking artists and writers to re-write sections of the bible (I see pretty illuminations too but I’m that kind of person) to make them personally relevant. that too, would have been interesting and more controlled, probably less offensive – but probably would be less raw and real.

Edit: I completely forgot to mention that the title of this post was one of the additions made during the exhibition.

4 thoughts on ““I am Bi, Female and Proud. I want no god who is disappointed in this”

  1. I like the concept. Didn’t the Church rewrite Christianity around the time Constantine made it the official religion of the Roman Empire?

    I’m not religious either but I do find religion fascinating (and sometimes amusing). I find the much religious dogma simply isn’t relevant but a means to control and manipulate people through fear and guilt while perpetuating ignorance and political agendas.

  2. Devil’s Advocate that I sometimes can be (who, me?), I feel some sort of symbolic connection here but my brain has slowed down a bit and can’t quite fine tune it.

    Start here: Someone fills a gallery full of YOUR paintings with a sign that says “Do you feel that Jennie is reaching you with her art? If not, change the message she is trying, in her own way, to convey.” And there’s a box of magic markers on the table.

    When you see what they have done to the children of your flesh, the sweat of your brow, will you reconsider how you convey your feelings and express yourself in a way to ‘reach’ them?

    Or will you just say, “Screw ’em, whatta THEY know?!”

    Does that make any sense?

    Be that as it may, the Status Quo will protect itself. It cares less about the litttle folks than big money and polotics, as always.

  3. lol! I think you have an excuse Steve! 🙂

    to be honest, sans magic markers, that’s pretty much what an exhibition is, the artist gets to stand there and smile while everyone interprets their work for them. and is it really really hard! usually it’s a positive experience but there are times when people just don’t get it. and they aren’t going to, but they always have insights and I always learn something about how people view my works. I like hearing the different interpretations people have about my pieces.

    but that’s me.

    in this case, the author of this iteration of the bible is not around. possibly in some spiritual sense, but I have feelings about translations that I am not going to go into now. if there is someone listening in the literal sense and taking note, perhaps they will consider inspiring a new Testament. who knows? I do think it’s an interesting idea – however I should point out that it does go against one of my basic beliefs which is that books shouldn’t be defaced – so I hope they are working with photocopies!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s